{"id":4459,"date":"2026-07-21T10:33:45","date_gmt":"2026-07-21T10:33:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/?p=4459"},"modified":"2026-07-18T17:07:30","modified_gmt":"2026-07-18T17:07:30","slug":"appsumo-daitai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/appsumo-alternatives\/","title":{"rendered":"9 AppSumo Alternatives Compared (Why Sumo Still Wins) \u2694\ufe0f"},"content":{"rendered":"

I keep a small experimental budget \u2014 a few hundred dollars a year \u2014 specifically for buying software everywhere that is \u306a\u3044<\/em> AppSumo. Partly curiosity, partly professional duty for these guides, and partly because monogamy toward any marketplace deserves periodic stress-testing. The results across several years are consistent enough to summarize in one sentence: the alternatives are real, several are honest, a few are occasionally brilliant \u2014 and my shutdown rate, refund friction, and dud frequency all run roughly double what I experience on AppSumo.<\/strong> This guide walks the full landscape anyway, because knowing the alternatives makes you a sharper buyer everywhere: the smaller LTD marketplaces, direct vendor lifetime deals, subscription-discount platforms, open-source substitutes, and the deal-aggregator newsletters that tie the ecosystem together. Each gets an honest profile \u2014 strengths, weaknesses, who it genuinely serves \u2014 before the final comparison table renders the verdict my ledger already spoiled. \u2696\ufe0f<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf2e Compare Against AppSumo’s Live Deals \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n

\ud83e\uddfe \u4e3b\u306a\u30dd\u30a4\u30f3\u30c8<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u8cea\u554f<\/th>\n\u7c21\u6f54\u306a\u7b54\u3048<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Are there real AppSumo alternatives?<\/td>\nYes \u2014 smaller LTD marketplaces, direct vendor deals, and more<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The structural gap<\/td>\nAppSumo's scale wins vetting, guarantees, and deal gravity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Refund comparison<\/td>\nAppSumo's 60 days vs the industry's typical 30 or less<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Where alternatives shine<\/td>\nNiche tools, occasional exclusives, price-checking leverage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
My cross-platform record<\/td>\nRoughly double the dud\/shutdown rate off-AppSumo<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Best strategy<\/td>\nAppSumo as home base; alternatives as scouts \ud83c\udfaf<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
New buyer?<\/td>\n10% off your first AppSumo order<\/a> \ud83c\udf81<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The Yardstick: What Any Alternative Must Beat \ud83d\udccf<\/h2>\n

Fair comparison requires declaring the benchmark, so here is what an alternative is up against, feature by feature. Scale and gravity:<\/strong> AppSumo lists 366 live products<\/strong>, has run continuously for sixteen years, and \u2014 decisively \u2014 is where the strongest software teams choose<\/em> to launch, because the biggest audience lives there. Deal flow follows audience; audience follows deal flow; the flywheel is sixteen years deep. Vetting:<\/strong> the Select badge marks deals reviewed by the platform's team for quality and support, Originals are AppSumo's own near-zero-risk products, and the review corpus \u2014 911 reviews on TidyCal alone \u2014 represents due-diligence capital no young marketplace can replicate quickly. The guarantee:<\/strong> sixty days, self-serve, full-price, tested twice by me at two-and-three-day turnarounds \u2014 against an industry norm of thirty days or less with variable enforcement.<\/p>\n

Buyer economics:<\/strong> deals at 67\u201395% below list, a 10% first-order offer<\/a>, the Plus program's<\/a> coupon stream for repeat buyers, and Black Friday's annual floor. Any alternative claiming your budget must beat this bundle somewhere specific \u2014 deeper niche coverage, exclusive inventory, better prices on comparable quality \u2014 and the honest finding of my experimental budget is that the wins are real but narrow, while the losses concentrate exactly where the bundle's protections would have caught them. Hold that yardstick as we walk the field; it converts marketing pages into measurable claims, which is the entire skill of shopping this ecosystem well. \ud83d\udd2c<\/p>\n

\"AppSumo<\/p>\n

The Smaller LTD Marketplaces: The Direct Rivals \ud83c\udfea<\/h2>\n

The closest analogues run AppSumo's exact model at smaller scale \u2014 lifetime software deals, campaign windows, tiered licenses \u2014 and several have operated credibly for years. Their genuine strengths deserve stating first. Niche depth:<\/strong> smaller shops sometimes surface developer tools, regional products, and micro-SaaS that AppSumo's mainstream-facing catalog passes over; two of my off-platform keepers came from exactly this shelf. Occasional exclusives:<\/strong> vendors sometimes launch where commission terms are friendlier, so cross-checking a wanted tool's campaign locations occasionally finds better tiers elsewhere. Negotiating leverage:<\/strong> even as a loyal Sumo-ling, knowing the field's prices sharpens every purchase decision \u2014 comparison literacy is free alpha.<\/p>\n

The structural weaknesses are equally consistent, and they compound at exactly the wrong moments. Vetting thins with scale:<\/strong> smaller marketplaces need inventory to survive, acceptance bars drop accordingly, and my double-rate dud experience traces directly to deals that AppSumo's Select process would plausibly have filtered. Guarantees shrink:<\/strong> thirty days is the common ceiling, some shops run fourteen, and enforcement friction \u2014 support tickets, reason requirements, store-credit substitutions \u2014 appears precisely when you need the exit. Shutdown risk doubles twice:<\/strong> the products skew earlier-stage \u305d\u3057\u3066<\/em> the marketplaces themselves are mortal; a young marketplace sunsetting takes its license registry and support infrastructure with it, a failure mode AppSumo's sixteen years have essentially retired. The rational posture: shop them with the experimental slice of your budget, never the foundation slice, and apply triple diligence \u2014 team pulse, revenue model, review recency \u2014 to everything. Scouts, not settlers. \ud83d\udd75\ufe0f<\/p>\n

Direct Vendor Lifetime Deals: The Unlisted Market \ud83e\udd1d<\/h2>\n

A parallel market runs entirely off-marketplace: software vendors selling lifetime licenses from their own sites \u2014 launch promotions, anniversary specials, "founding member" tiers on new products, and the quiet perpetual-license options some mature tools still maintain. The appeal is real. Terms can be richer:<\/strong> without marketplace commission, vendors sometimes offer higher limits or bonus features at comparable prices. Relationships run direct:<\/strong> your license, support, and upgrade path live with the maker, no intermediary. And the inventory is unique:<\/strong> plenty of excellent tools never run marketplace campaigns at all, making direct deals the only lifetime path to them.<\/p>\n

The risk profile, however, is the ecosystem's steepest, because every marketplace protection disappears simultaneously. No platform guarantee stands behind the purchase \u2014 refunds run on the vendor's own policy and mood. No review corpus aggregates buyer experience \u2014 you are researching from testimonials the vendor curated. No vetting precedes the listing \u2014 the "founding member lifetime deal" on a six-week-old product is precisely the demographic where my one genuinely painful off-platform loss lived. My rules for this market, learned at tuition: buy direct only from teams with visible revenue, multi-year history, and public changelogs; treat pre-launch lifetime offers as donations you hope become products; and price every direct deal against the possibility of zero recourse. When those filters pass, direct deals can be excellent \u2014 one runs my analytics to this day. But the filters do the work the marketplace would have done, and most buyers most of the time are better served letting AppSumo's machinery do it instead. \ud83c\udfed<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf81 The Protected Route: 10% Off Your First AppSumo Order \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n

Subscription Discounters and Startup Programs \ud83d\udcb3<\/h2>\n

A different species entirely: platforms and programs that discount subscriptions<\/em> rather than replacing them \u2014 startup credit programs from major SaaS vendors, bundle promotions, non-profit and education pricing, and the negotiation-platform services that trim enterprise renewals. Honest assessment requires separating audiences. For venture-scale startups<\/strong>, the credit programs are genuinely excellent \u2014 five-figure cloud and tooling credits dwarf anything lifetime deals offer at that consumption scale, and any funded founder should harvest them fully. For enterprises<\/strong>, negotiation services earn their keep against six-figure renewals. Neither describes this site's core reader: the freelancer, small business, agency, or creator whose software budget is measured in hundreds monthly and whose pain is perpetual billing itself.<\/p>\n

For that reader, subscription discounting solves the wrong layer of the problem. A 20% discount on a $50-per-month tool still bills $480 a year, forever, with the discount typically expiring into full price after the promotional period \u2014 the mechanism my lifetime-deal-vs-subscription math<\/a> prices in full. The same function covered by a $69 lifetime deal costs $69, once, with break-even inside two months. Discounted rent is still rent. The legitimate use of this species for small operators is narrow and tactical: harvesting time-limited credits for tools that have no credible LTD equivalent, and bridging with discounted subscriptions while waiting for the right campaign to appear on the \u30cb\u30e5\u30fc\u30c7\u30a3\u30fc\u30eb\u30ec\u30fc\u30c0\u30fc<\/a>. As a foundation strategy, it is the exact treadmill the lifetime model exists to escape. \ud83c\udfa1<\/p>\n

Open Source: The Free Alternative With a Time Price \ud83d\udc27<\/h2>\n

The most philosophically appealing alternative costs nothing and is owned by no one: open-source substitutes exist for a remarkable share of the AppSumo catalog \u2014 analytics, scheduling, email, automation, CRM, forms \u2014 and self-hosting enthusiasts assemble entire zero-license stacks from them. Where open source genuinely wins, it wins completely: data sovereignty<\/strong> (your server, your rules), infinite lifetime<\/strong> (no vendor can sunset code you hold), zero license cost at any scale<\/strong>, and communities whose transparency embarrasses proprietary changelogs. For technical operators with server comfort and privacy priorities, several categories \u2014 analytics most prominently \u2014 have open options strong enough that I recommend evaluating them \u524d\u306b<\/em> any purchase, marketplace or otherwise.<\/p>\n

The honest ledger fills in the other column: time is the license fee.<\/strong> Self-hosting means provisioning, updating, securing, backing up, and debugging \u2014 hours that carry real hourly value for exactly the audience reading this site. Feature velocity varies with maintainer bandwidth; polish and support run on goodwill; and integration burden lands on you. My own split after years of testing both: open source runs where sovereignty matters most and my maintenance appetite is real, lifetime deals run everywhere else \u2014 because a $29-to-$69 one-time license that ships, updates, and supports itself is, at small-operator hourly rates, frequently cheaper than free<\/em>. The comparison is not ideological; it is arithmetic with your calendar. Run it per-category and both models earn places in a rational stack. \ud83e\uddee<\/p>\n

\n

\ud83d\udcca The field, scored against the yardstick<\/p>\n

\nAppSumo<\/text>\n\n9.0<\/text>\nSmall LTD shops<\/text>\n\n5.6<\/text>\nDirect vendor LTDs<\/text>\n\n4.9<\/text>\nSubscription discounts<\/text>\n\n4.3<\/text>\nOpen source<\/text>\n\n6.4<\/text>\nComposite: vetting, guarantee, economics, longevity, small-operator fit (author’s scoring)<\/text>\n<\/svg>\n<\/div>\n

The Aggregators and Deal Newsletters: The Meta-Layer \ud83d\udcec<\/h2>\n

Around the marketplaces orbits a meta-ecosystem \u2014 LTD-tracking newsletters, deal-aggregation sites, Facebook groups tens of thousands strong, and subreddits where every major campaign gets dissected within hours. This layer sells nothing directly, and used well it upgrades every purchase you make anywhere. The communities are the real product:<\/strong> veteran buyers publish teardown reviews faster than any blog, surface red flags mid-campaign, and maintain institutional memory about vendors' previous launches that no deal page will volunteer. Before any purchase above $100 \u2014 on AppSumo or off \u2014 ten minutes of community search is diligence I never skip; it has saved me from two would-be mistakes and talked me into<\/em> one keeper I had underrated.<\/p>\n

The layer's hazard is its incentive gradient: aggregator sites monetize clicks on everything, which produces coverage where every deal is somehow worth considering, and FOMO amplified across five newsletters arrives five times as persuasive. The corrective is using the meta-layer for verification<\/em>, never discovery<\/em> \u2014 your bills-first shortlist<\/a> decides what you research; the communities inform how the research concludes. Slot the layer there and it completes a healthy ecosystem posture: AppSumo as home base for its bundle of protections, alternatives as scouts for niche inventory, open source where sovereignty pays its time price, and the meta-layer as a free diligence department staffed by ten thousand grumpy experts. That configuration has governed my budget for years, and the ledger keeps endorsing it. \ud83c\udf10<\/p>\n

The Head-to-Head Test: One Tool, Every Channel \ud83d\udd00<\/h2>\n

Last year I ran the cleanest experiment this guide's thesis allows: I needed a social-scheduling tool, and instead of defaulting to habit I shopped the identical requirement across every channel simultaneously, documenting as I went. On AppSumo:<\/strong> two candidate deals, one Select-badged at $59 with 340 reviews settled at 4.4 tacos, tier chart clear, founder answering questions same-day, sixty-day guarantee printed. Research time: forty minutes to a confident shortlist. On the smaller marketplaces:<\/strong> three candidates, one genuinely interesting niche tool \u2014 but review counts under thirty, a fourteen-day guarantee on one shop, and vendor histories requiring an evening of external digging to establish. Direct from vendors:<\/strong> one "founding lifetime" offer on a beautiful landing page for a product whose changelog was younger than my shortlist document. Open source:<\/strong> one credible self-hosted option, honestly evaluated at four-to-six hours of setup plus ongoing maintenance against my $75-per-hour reality.<\/p>\n

The outcome was almost embarrassingly on-thesis. The AppSumo Select deal won on total cost of confidence \u2014 price plus research time plus recourse \u2014 and eighteen months later it remains a keeper that survived its day-45 review without drama. But the experiment's real yield was watching where the hours went<\/em>: off-platform, the diligence that AppSumo's machinery performs institutionally \u2014 vetting, review aggregation, guarantee enforcement \u2014 became my personal unpaid job, and pricing that job honestly at my own rate settled the comparison before any tool was purchased. That is the calculation most alternative-shopping guides omit, and it is the one that decides real budgets. Run this experiment once yourself on your next genuine need; the channel that wins your version is the channel that deserves your foundation. Mine has not changed since. \ud83e\uddea<\/p>\n

The Dimension Nobody Prices: Switching Costs \ud83d\udd04<\/h2>\n

One more lens completes the comparison, and it grows heavier every year you operate: what happens \u5f8c<\/em> the purchase, when tools must be lived with, migrated, or replaced. Marketplace choice quietly determines this too. A stack assembled on AppSumo concentrates your licenses, receipts, refund windows, and upgrade paths in one dashboard with one institutional counterparty whose sixteen-year history suggests it will outlive your stack's natural turnover. The same stack scattered across four small marketplaces, two direct vendors, and a self-hosted server distributes those anchors across seven counterparties of varying mortality \u2014 and when a marketplace<\/em> dies, its license registry, redemption support, and refund machinery die with it, orphaning purchases that the vendors themselves may or may not continue honoring. I hold one such orphan: the tool still runs, but its license exists only as an email thread and hope.<\/p>\n

Migration mathematics follow the same gradient. Replacing a sunsetted AppSumo tool means shopping a familiar catalog with your ledger's<\/a> data on what you actually used \u2014 a one-evening errand I have run three times. Replacing an orphaned direct purchase means re-researching a category from zero, often under deadline, in whatever channel happens to have inventory that month. None of this argues alternatives are unusable; it argues that fragmentation is a cost<\/em>, denominated in future hours and future risk, and that the cost is invisible on every individual purchase while compounding across a portfolio. Small operators \u2014 the people whose entire advantage is operational simplicity \u2014 should price it explicitly. Consolidation is not loyalty; it is logistics. \ud83d\udce6<\/p>\n

Running Your Own Experimental Budget (The Safe Way) \ud83e\udded<\/h2>\n

If this guide has made you curious rather than converted, good \u2014 curiosity, properly caged, is how comparison literacy gets built. Here is the cage that has kept my own experiments cheap. Size the slice:<\/strong> ten to fifteen percent of annual software spend, hard-capped, tracked in its own ledger column \u2014 enough to learn, too little to hurt. Constrain the targets:<\/strong> experiments buy only from the alternatives' genuine strength zones \u2014 niche tools absent from AppSumo's catalog, sovereignty plays, credible exclusives \u2014 never duplicates of functions your foundation stack already covers, which is how experiments metastasize into clutter. Triple the diligence:<\/strong> every off-platform purchase gets the community-search pass, the vendor-history check, and an explicit note of the refund terms \u524d\u306b<\/em> payment, because the machinery you are used to is not standing behind you out here.<\/p>\n

And export the lessons, not just the tools.<\/strong> Each experiment ends with one ledger line \u2014 what it cost, what it taught, whether the channel earned another trial \u2014 and those lines are the actual product; my "roughly double the failure rate" headline is nothing but their sum. Run two or three such experiments a year and you will hold something most buyers never acquire: personally-priced knowledge of the entire ecosystem, immune to both marketplace marketing and alternative-site hype. The likeliest outcome, if my ledger and this article's whole argument hold, is that your experiments will keep teaching the same graduate lesson mine did \u2014 that the alternatives' best gift is making you appreciate, with receipts, exactly what the home base bundles. That is a fine return on ten percent. \ud83c\udf93<\/p>\n

Verdict: A Field Worth Knowing, A Winner Worth Keeping \ud83c\udfc1<\/h2>\n

Here is the conclusion my experimental budget bought, compressed. The alternatives earn three legitimate roles:<\/strong> niche-inventory scouting on the smaller marketplaces, sovereignty plays via open source, and tactical credits for funded startups \u2014 plus the meta-layer's free diligence everywhere. AppSumo retains the foundation role on structural grounds:<\/strong> the deepest vetting, the industry-ceiling sixty-day guarantee, the review corpus, sixteen years of institutional durability, and buyer economics \u2014 first-order discount, Plus, Black Friday \u2014 that no rival bundles. My cross-platform ledger prices the difference at roughly double the failure rate off-platform, which is precisely the margin the missing protections would have absorbed. Diversification in software buying, it turns out, means diversifying tools<\/em>, not trust<\/em>.<\/p>\n

So shop the field with open eyes and a small experimental slice \u2014 comparison literacy compounds. But build the stack where the machinery protects it: bills-first selection, golden-window timing, next-year tiers, day-45 reminders, all running on the platform whose guarantee has twice returned my money in under three days. Home base is below. \ud83c\udf2e<\/p>\n

And if you arrived at this article shopping for an alternative because something on AppSumo disappointed you \u2014 a dud purchase, a missed window, a tool that sunsetted \u2014 consider first whether the failure was the platform's or the process's. Nearly every disappointment I hear in community threads traces to skipped diligence, ignored tier charts, or unset reminders: process failures that will follow you to any marketplace and hurt worse where the safety nets are thinner. Fix the process where the guarantee is longest, then explore. The alternatives will still be there \u2014 smaller, riskier, and occasionally wonderful \u2014 when your foundation no longer depends on them. \ud83e\uddf1<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf2e Browse AppSumo \u2014 The Home Base \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf81 \u30e1\u30fc\u30eb\u767b\u9332\u3067\u521d\u56de\u6ce8\u6587\u304c10%\u30aa\u30d5 \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n

\u3088\u304f\u3042\u308b\u8cea\u554f\u2753<\/h2>\n

What is the best AppSumo alternative?<\/strong>
\nDepends on the role: smaller LTD marketplaces for niche inventory scouting, open source for sovereignty-priority categories, startup credit programs for funded companies. As a foundation marketplace, nothing currently matches AppSumo's vetting-guarantee-economics bundle.<\/p>\n

Are smaller lifetime-deal sites safe?<\/strong>
\nSeveral are honest businesses; the risk sits in thinner vetting, shorter guarantees, and double mortality \u2014 products and marketplaces both. Shop them with experimental budget and triple diligence, never with foundation budget.<\/p>\n

Should I buy lifetime deals directly from vendors?<\/strong>
\nOnly from teams with visible revenue, multi-year history, and public changelogs \u2014 and price in zero platform recourse. Pre-launch "founder lifetime" offers are donations wearing deal costumes.<\/p>\n

Is open source better than lifetime deals?<\/strong>
\nDifferent currency: open source charges time (hosting, updates, security) instead of money. Run the arithmetic per category at your real hourly value; most small operators land on a mixed stack.<\/p>\n

Why do you still recommend AppSumo after testing everything?<\/strong>
\nBecause my ledger does: roughly double the dud and shutdown rate everywhere else, with slower, frictionier refunds when things went wrong. The 60\u65e5\u9593\u4fdd\u8a3c<\/a> and Select vetting are the difference, and they compound over a portfolio.<\/p>\n

How should a beginner split their budget?<\/strong>
\nAll foundation purchases on AppSumo with the \u521d\u56de\u6ce8\u658710\uff05\u5272\u5f15<\/a> and full day-45 discipline; zero experimental budget until the foundation stack is built and the buying system<\/a> is habit.<\/p>\n

\u95a2\u9023\u6587\u732e\uff1a Is AppSumo legit?<\/a> \u30fb Full AppSumo review<\/a> \u30fb \u751f\u6daf\u5951\u7d04 vs \u5b9a\u671f\u8cfc\u8aad<\/a> \u30fb \u8cfc\u5165\u30ac\u30a4\u30c9<\/a><\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Every serious AppSumo alternative compared: LTD marketplaces, direct vendor deals, subscription discounts, and open source \u2014 and the honest verdict on where your money is safest.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4397,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[634],"tags":[635,661,637,662,638],"class_list":["post-4459","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-appsumo","tag-appsumo","tag-appsumo-alternatives","tag-lifetime-deals","tag-ltd-marketplaces","tag-software-deals"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4459","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4459"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4459\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4463,"href":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4459\/revisions\/4463"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4397"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yamuparkoti.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}